Home Contact
Login   |  Tell a Friend
mutual fund

 Top Fund Managers
Latest Mutual Fund News Latest Mutual Fund News

Financial Advisor Sponsor:Dean L. Boebinger


 Bookmark this site!
Follow FundMojo on Twitter
Get Fund Information

Get Stock News

(Enter Stock Symbol)

Partner Sites

Annuities
Wall Street Journal
eHealthInsurance
Fund Mojo on Facebook
Fund Mojo help you discover the best fund managers, funds, and related information

Fund Intelligence | Best Managers | IGDYX Insights | IGDYX Score | IGDYX Performance | IGDYX Manager | IGDYX News | IGDYX Allocation | IGDYX Holdings Change

AIM Gold & Precious Metals Y (IGDYX): N/A (0.72 - *manager is new*)

  

Score Weighting: AIM Gold & Precious Metals Y (IGDYX)

Here are the factors and weightings on how we come up with the score

  1. Short-term performance beats Equity Precious Metals category average: 10%
  2. Mid-term performance beats Equity Precious Metals category average: 15%
  3. Long-term performance beats Equity Precious Metals category average: 15%
  4. Morningstar rating: 10%
  5. Ratio of number of positive-return years over number of negative-return years: 15%
  6. Expense ratio is smaller than its Equity Precious Metals category peers: 10%
  7. Performance vs volatility (ie. Sharper, Treynor, Standard Deviation) beats Equity Precious Metals category peers: 10%
  8. Relative safety beats Equity Precious Metals category peers: 15%
** We also apply various filters and calculations on each factor to ensure best representation of the fund performance

  

Score Grade: AIM Gold & Precious Metals Y (IGDYX)

How we convert Fund Mojo Score to a letter grade

  1. Mojo Master: Fund Mojo score is greater than 0.85
  2. A+: Fund Mojo score is greater than 0.8
  3. A: Fund Mojo score is between 0.7 - 0.8
  4. B: Fund Mojo score is between 0.6 - 0.7
  5. C: Fund Mojo score is between 0.5 - 0.6
  6. D: Fund Mojo score is between 0.4 - 0.5
  7. E: Fund Mojo score less than 0.4

  

Score Design Philosophy: AIM Gold & Precious Metals Y (IGDYX)

Our thinking behind the weighting factors

  • Performance needs to be accomplished by the same fund manager on a consistent basis. We give great credit to a fund manager who can outperform its category peer on a consistent basis over many years. If the performance is not generated by the fund manager (ie. recent manager changes), then it is hard to predict whether a fund will continuously perform well in the future.
  • Performance needs to accomplished under reasonable volatility. Some funds have great returns on average over years, but the magnitude of up-and-down is significant that they are not suitable for investors to tolerate. Top funds on our list have great Sharpe ratio and up-year vs down-year track record.
  • Expense should be in-line with the category. We realize that great managers do not come cheap and small funds need to charge a higher fee to survive, so we added some buffer for these managers, but it is important for investors not to pay super-premium for a fund.
  • Safety. While there are great upside to be accomplished, top investors stay in the game because they don't lose money over difficult time. We put weight on a fund's ability to survive bear market and not to lose a lot of money over a 3 year downturn.